Unit 15 - Competition Law
Table of Contents
Unit 15, International Legal English Exercises and Flashcards
These exercises focus on Unit 15, International Legal English
Wordlist for Unit 15, International Legal English
Word |
Definition |
Example |
cartel |
a group of similar independent companies who agree to join together to control prices and limit competition |
The authorities uncovered a cartel formed by several major oil companies to fix prices and control the petroleum market |
merger |
the joining together of two or more companies |
The merger between the two telecom giants resulted in a more formidable competitor with expanded reach and resources |
oligopoly |
a market situation in which a small number of firms compete with each other |
The smartphone industry is characterized by an oligopoly, with a few major players dominating the market and setting prices accordingly |
monopoly |
an organisation or group that has complete control of an area of business so that others have no share |
The government imposed strict regulations to prevent any single company from attaining a monopoly in the telecommunications sector |
competition law |
Legal regulations and principles designed to promote fair competition and prevent anti-competitive practices in the marketplace |
Competition law aims to ensure fair and open markets by prohibiting anticompetitive practices like price-fixing and abuse of dominance |
anti-competitive |
Actions, behaviors, or practices that go against the principles of fair competition and seek to hinder, distort, or manipulate market competition |
The company's anti-competitive behavior, such as exclusive contracts with suppliers, raised concerns about fair market competition |
single European market |
A unified economic area in the European Union where goods, services, capital, and labor can move freely without barriers among member states |
The single European market facilitates the free movement of goods, services, capital, and people within the European Union's member states |
private undertaking |
A non-governmental entity or organization, typically a business, that operates within the framework of competition law and market regulations |
The company operated as a private undertaking, which limited its shareholder base to a select group and reduced public disclosure |
antitrust |
A term often used in the United States to refer to laws and regulations aimed at preventing monopolistic or anti-competitive behavior |
The antitrust authorities launched an investigation into allegations of anticompetitive behavior by a dominant tech corporation |
trust |
A large business organization that controlled multiple companies and sought to monopolize markets; often subject to antitrust actions |
In the late 19th century, trusts played a significant role in consolidating economic power and controlling various industries |
trustbuster |
A person or entity, often a government official, responsible for enforcing antitrust laws and breaking up trusts or monopolies |
Theodore Roosevelt is often remembered as a trustbuster for his efforts to break up monopolistic trusts in the early 1900s |
economic efficiency |
The optimal allocation of resources and factors of production to maximize the production of goods and services, often a goal of competition law |
Improving economic efficiency is a key goal of regulatory agencies, aiming to optimize resource allocation and benefit consumers |
market economy |
An economic system in which resources and prices are determined by supply and demand in a competitive market |
A market economy relies on supply and demand forces, where prices are determined by the market rather than government intervention |
relevant market |
The specific market or industry in which a product or service competes, often defined based on factors like product type and geographic scope |
Identifying the relevant market is crucial in competition law cases to define the scope of competition and potential antitrust violations |
barriers to entry |
Obstacles or impediments that make it difficult for new firms to enter and compete in a specific market or industry |
High startup costs and regulatory hurdles are common barriers to entry that discourage new competitors from entering the market |
penetrate the market |
To successfully enter and establish a presence in a market, often by overcoming barriers to entry |
The company's strategy was to penetrate the market by offering competitive prices and innovative products to attract new customers |
price-fixing |
An illegal practice where competing businesses conspire to set prices at a fixed, agreed-upon level, limiting competition |
The investigation revealed that the major electronics manufacturers engaged in price-fixing, artificially inflating the cost of devices |
parallel behaviour |
The practice of competitors in a market following similar pricing, marketing, or business strategies, often raising concerns about collusion |
Competitors engaging in parallel behaviour, such as mirroring each other's pricing, raised suspicions of collusion in the industry |
abuse a dominant position |
Exploitative actions by a dominant market player to restrict competition, often considered anti-competitive behavior |
The dominant player in the search engine market was accused of abusing its position by favoring its own services in search results |
predatory pricing |
Setting prices below cost to drive competitors out of the market, often with the intent to later raise prices once competition is eliminated |
The smaller startup accused the industry giant of predatory pricing, alleging that it intentionally undercut prices to eliminate competition |
tie-in arrangements |
Combining the sale of one product or service with another, often used to leverage market dominance or limit consumer choice |
The company used tie-in arrangements, requiring customers to purchase one product to access another, effectively limiting choices |
merger regulation |
Legal rules and oversight related to the consolidation of companies through mergers and acquisitions to ensure fair competition |
Merger regulation involves assessing whether proposed mergers and acquisitions might substantially lessen competition in the market |
horizontal terms |
Aspects of competition law and regulation that pertain to practices among firms operating at the same level of production or distribution within a market |
The merger agreement included horizontal terms that governed the integration of two competing companies operating in the same market |
vertical terms |
Aspects of competition law and regulation that address practices between firms operating at different levels of production or distribution within a market |
Vertical terms in this lease agreement specify the responsibilities of the landlord and tenant. |
initiate proceedings |
To formally start legal actions or proceedings, often referring to the commencement of legal actions related to competition law |
The court granted permission to initiate proceedings for the case to move forward. |
collude on prices |
Illegally cooperating with competitors to fix or manipulate prices in a way that undermines market competition |
The evidence showed that the competing firms colluded on prices, coordinating their pricing strategies to maintain higher profit margins |
limit access |
Actions or practices that restrict or deny entry to competitors in a market, often leading to anti-competitive concerns |
The industry leader used exclusive contracts to limit access to critical suppliers, making it difficult for new entrants to compete |
impose a fine |
To levy a monetary penalty or sanction as a consequence for anti-competitive behavior or violations of competition law |
To deter anti-competitive behavior, the antitrust agency decided to impose a significant fine on the company for its violations |
anti-competitive behaviour |
Actions, practices, or conduct that contravene competition law principles and harm or hinder market competition |
Engaging in anti-competitive behaviour not only harms competitors but also stifles innovation and negatively impacts consumers |
bid-rigging |
Collusive actions where competitors coordinate bids on contracts or auctions to manipulate prices or outcomes |
The construction companies involved in bid-rigging schemes artificially inflated project costs, resulting in financial losses for taxpayers |
per se violation |
A type of anti-competitive behavior or practice that is considered illegal without the need for further analysis or proof of harm |
Some antitrust violations are considered per se violations, meaning they are inherently anti-competitive and do not require further proof |
territorial allocation |
An anti-competitive practice where competitors divide markets or territories among themselves to limit competition |
The companies engaged in territorial allocation, agreeing not to compete with each other in specific geographic regions to maintain prices |
Let me caution you that |
An expression used to advise or warn someone about a potential issue or concern in a diplomatic manner |
Let me caution you that making hasty decisions without considering all the facts could be detrimental |
I must warn you that |
A phrase used to convey a sense of caution or forewarning when discussing a potential matter or challenge |
I must warn you that investing in this venture carries significant risks that you should be aware of |
You should be aware that |
A statement used to bring attention to or inform someone about a particular fact, situation, or circumstance |
You should be aware that the benefits of the new software solution extend beyond just cost savings |
benefits of the solution |
The positive outcomes, advantages, or improvements that are expected to result from implementing a proposed solution |
The benefits of the solution include increased efficiency, reduced errors, and improved customer service |
proposed solution |
A recommended course of action or strategy intended to address and resolve a specific problem or challenge |
Our proposed solution to the problem involves streamlining internal processes and enhancing communication |
reason for writing |
The purpose or motivation behind writing a communication, often explained in the introductory portion of a message or document |
The reason for writing this report is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the recent market developments |
implementation of the solution |
The process of putting a proposed solution or plan into action to address a problem or achieve a desired outcome |
Implementation of the solution requires close collaboration between the IT and marketing teams |
description of the problem |
An explanation or account of the specific issue or challenge that needs to be addressed or resolved |
The description of the problem highlighted several operational inefficiencies that need immediate attention |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48da1/48da1a544d64c160ead2a6f3227de0f90b034c19" alt="Illustration of Unit 15 - Competition Law"
FAQ
What is competition law?
Competition law is a legal framework that promotes fair competition by preventing monopolies, cartels, and other anti-competitive practices that harm consumers and market efficiency.
What is the difference between a cartel and an oligopoly?
-
A cartel is an illegal agreement between competing firms to fix prices, limit supply, or divide markets.
-
An oligopoly is a market structure where a few large firms dominate but do not necessarily collude.
What is the role of merger regulation in competition law?
Merger regulation ensures that mergers and acquisitions do not create monopolies or significantly reduce competition in a market.
What does it mean to "abuse a dominant position"?
A company abuses a dominant position when it uses its market power to eliminate competition, such as through predatory pricing or unfair contractual terms.
What is predatory pricing?
Predatory pricing occurs when a company sets prices below cost to drive competitors out of the market, intending to raise prices later.
What are tie-in arrangements?
A tie-in arrangement is when a seller forces buyers to purchase an additional product or service as a condition of buying the main product.
What is price-fixing?
Price-fixing is an illegal agreement between competitors to set prices at a certain level instead of allowing market forces to determine them.
What is bid-rigging?
Bid-rigging is a form of fraud where competitors agree in advance on who will win a public or private contract, violating fair competition laws.
What is meant by "anti-competitive behavior"?
Anti-competitive behavior includes practices like collusion, price-fixing, and market allocation, which unfairly limit competition.
What does "per se violation" mean in competition law?
A per se violation is an anti-competitive practice that is automatically illegal, regardless of its actual market impact, such as price-fixing or bid-rigging.
What is territorial allocation?
Territorial allocation occurs when companies agree to divide markets geographically, preventing competition in certain areas.
What does it mean to "initiate proceedings" in competition law?
Initiating proceedings refers to starting a legal investigation or lawsuit against a company suspected of violating competition laws.
What is the difference between horizontal and vertical terms in competition law?
-
Horizontal terms refer to agreements between competitors at the same level of the supply chain (e.g., two manufacturers).
-
Vertical terms refer to agreements between companies at different levels of the supply chain (e.g., manufacturer and retailer).
What is the Single European Market in competition law?
The Single European Market ensures free movement of goods, services, capital, and labor across EU member states, promoting competition and preventing trade barriers.
What is a trustbuster?
A trustbuster is a government official or policy designed to break up monopolies and enforce antitrust laws.
What does "penetrate the market" mean?
To penetrate the market means to successfully enter and establish a presence in a competitive industry.
What does it mean to "impose a fine" in competition law?
Regulators impose fines on companies that engage in anti-competitive behavior, such as collusion or monopolistic practices.
What are the benefits of competition law enforcement?
Competition law enforcement protects consumers, encourages innovation, ensures fair pricing, and maintains a level playing field for businesses.